Bibliography

Bibliography#

Every work cited anywhere in the course, in one place. Entries are generated from book/references.bib.

For a curated, grouped reading list with commentary on why each paper matters and where it is used in the course, see Further reading instead.

[1]

Mario Geiger and Tess Smidt. e3nn: Euclidean Neural Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.09453, 2022. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.09453.

[2]

Nathaniel Thomas, Tess Smidt, Steven Kearnes, Lusann Yang, Li Li, Kai Kohlhoff, and Patrick Riley. Tensor field networks: Rotation- and translation-equivariant neural networks for 3D point clouds. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.08219, 2018. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.08219.

[3]

Maurice Weiler, Mario Geiger, Max Welling, Wouter Boomsma, and Taco Cohen. 3D steerable CNNs: Learning rotationally equivariant features in volumetric data. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2018.

[4]

Peter W. Battaglia, Jessica B. Hamrick, Victor Bapst, and others. Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.01261, 2018. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.01261.

[5]

Fabian B. Fuchs, Daniel E. Worrall, Volker Fischer, and Max Welling. SE(3)-Transformers: 3D roto-translation equivariant attention networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2020.

[6]

Brandon Anderson, Truong Son Hy, and Risi Kondor. Cormorant: Covariant molecular neural networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2019.

[7]

Yi-Lun Liao and Tess Smidt. Equiformer: Equivariant graph attention transformer for 3D atomistic graphs. In International Conference on Learning Representations. 2023. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.11990.

[8]

Andrea Grisafi, David M. Wilkins, Gábor Csányi, and Michele Ceriotti. Symmetry-adapted machine learning for tensorial properties of atomistic systems. Physical Review Letters, 120:036002, 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.036002.

[9]

Jörg Behler and Michele Parrinello. Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces. Physical Review Letters, 98:146401, 2007. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.146401.

[10]

Kristof T. Schütt, Pieter-Jan Kindermans, Huziel E. Sauceda, Stefan Chmiela, Alexandre Tkatchenko, and Klaus-Robert Müller. SchNet: A continuous-filter convolutional neural network for modeling quantum interactions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.08566, 2017. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.08566.

[11]

Kristof T. Schütt, Huziel E. Sauceda, Pieter-Jan Kindermans, Alexandre Tkatchenko, and Klaus-Robert Müller. SchNet – A deep learning architecture for molecules and materials. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 148:241722, 2018. doi:10.1063/1.5019779.

[12]

Johannes Gasteiger, Janek Groß, and Stephan Günnemann. Directional message passing for molecular graphs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.03123, 2020. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.03123.

[13]

Johannes Gasteiger, Shankari Giri, Johannes T. Margraf, and Stephan Günnemann. Fast and uncertainty-aware directional message passing for non-equilibrium molecules. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.14115, 2022. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.14115.

[14]

Simon Batzner, Albert Musaelian, Lixin Sun, Mario Geiger, Jonathan P. Mailoa, Mordechai Kornbluth, Nicola Molinari, Tess E. Smidt, and Boris Kozinsky. E(3)-equivariant graph neural networks for data-efficient and accurate interatomic potentials. Nature Communications, 13:2453, 2022. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-29939-5.

[15]

Albert Musaelian, Simon Batzner, Anders Johansson, Lixin Sun, Cameron J. Owen, Mordechai Kornbluth, and Boris Kozinsky. Learning local equivariant representations for large-scale atomistic dynamics. Nature Communications, 14:579, 2023. doi:10.1038/s41467-023-36329-y.

[16]

Ilyes Batatia, Dávid Péter Kovács, Gregor N. C. Simm, Christoph Ortner, and Gábor Csányi. MACE: Higher order equivariant message passing neural networks for fast and accurate force fields. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2022.

[17]

Ilyes Batatia, Simon Batzner, Dávid Péter Kovács, and others. The design space of E(3)-equivariant atom-centred interatomic potentials. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.06643, 2022. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.06643.

[18]

Ilyes Batatia, Simon Batzner, Dávid Péter Kovács, and others. The design space of E(3)-equivariant atom-centred interatomic potentials. Nature Machine Intelligence, 7:56, 2025. doi:10.1038/s42256-024-00956-x.

[19]

Dávid Péter Kovács, Ilyes Batatia, Eszter S. Arany, and Gábor Csányi. Evaluation of the MACE force field architecture: From medicinal chemistry to materials science. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 159:044118, 2023. doi:10.1063/5.0155322.

[20]

Dávid Péter Kovács, J. Harry Moore, Nicholas J. Browning, and others. MACE-OFF: Transferable short range machine learning force fields for organic molecules. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 147:17598, 2025. doi:10.1021/jacs.4c07099.

[21]

Ilyes Batatia, Philipp Benner, Yuan Chiang, and others. A foundation model for atomistic materials chemistry. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.00096, 2024. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.00096.

[22]

Ralf Drautz. Atomic cluster expansion for accurate and transferable interatomic potentials. Physical Review B, 99:014104, 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.99.014104.

[23]

Geneviève Dusson, Markus Bachmayr, Gábor Csányi, Ralf Drautz, Simon Etter, Cas van der Oord, and Christoph Ortner. Atomic cluster expansion: Completeness, efficiency and stability. Journal of Computational Physics, 454:110946, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2022.110946.

[24]

Jigyasa Nigam, Sergey Pozdnyakov, Guillaume Fraux, and Michele Ceriotti. Unified theory of atom-centered representations and message-passing machine-learning schemes. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 156:204115, 2022. doi:10.1063/5.0087042.

[25]

Sergey N. Pozdnyakov and Michele Ceriotti. Incompleteness of graph neural networks for points clouds in three dimensions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.07136, 2022. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.07136.

[26]

Sanggyu Chong and others. Resolving the body-order paradox of machine-learned interatomic potentials. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 164:064121, 2026. doi:10.1063/5.0303302.

[27]

Andrea Grisafi and Michele Ceriotti. Incorporating long-range physics in atomic-scale machine learning. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 151:204105, 2019. doi:10.1063/1.5128375.

[28]

Arthur Kosmala, Johannes Gasteiger, Nicholas Gao, and Stephan Günnemann. Ewald-based long-range message passing for molecular graphs. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 202, 17544. 2023. URL: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v202/kosmala23a.html.

[29]

Bingqing Cheng. Latent Ewald summation for machine learning of long-range interactions. npj Computational Materials, 11:80, 2025. doi:10.1038/s41524-025-01577-7.

[30]

Jiří Kolafa and John W. Perram. Cutoff errors in the Ewald summation formulae for point charge systems. Molecular Simulation, 9:351, 1992. doi:10.1080/08927029208049126.

[31]

Stefan Chmiela, Alexandre Tkatchenko, Huziel E. Sauceda, Igor Poltavsky, Kristof T. Schütt, and Klaus-Robert Müller. Machine learning of accurate energy-conserving molecular force fields. Science Advances, 3:e1603015, 2017. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1603015.

[32]

Anders S. Christensen and O. Anatole von Lilienfeld. On the role of gradients for machine learning of molecular energies and forces. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.09593, 2020. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.09593.